An Exploration of Ethical Methods in Ghanaian Investigative Journalism

Abstract

Investigative journalism is specialized journalism dedicated to detail and precision, to uncover issues that ordinarily, conventional journalism may not casually or easily unearth. In Ghana, investigative journalists have been one of the fiercest critics of government corruption, and have been actively involved in investigating corruption in government using various methods. The use of clandestine methods and subterfuge by journalists such as Anas Aremeyaw Anas has been both praised and criticized. This study explored the perceptions of media professionals, activists, and academics regarding the use of clandestine methods or subterfuge in investigative journalism. The study adopted a qualitative methodology and used question guides to conduct interviews with seven respondents, considered experts in their various areas. The study established that the use of clandestine methods and subterfuge in Ghanaian journalism was conditional, not a standard practice, premised on and influenced by several factors. Key amongst them were the legal and ethical context in which journalists operate, practical realities, the prevailing wind of public opinion, and the experience of the journalist.